Thursday, February 11, 2010

What is the difference between ';identity theft'; and ';using false documents';?

When a citizen of the US is caught with someone else's ID...it is ';identify theft'; punishable by law.








When an il-legal a-lien steals someones ID they are only using ';false papers'; or ';flase documents';





Why the double standards?What is the difference between ';identity theft'; and ';using false documents';?
Identity theft is when a person steals another persons


identity i.e. stolen credit cards,or over the internet.A class


4 felony. Useing false or stolen documents is a white paper


case, falseifing or altering paper documents for ones own


gain. This is federal. As far as an illegal alien doing such,


they get a slap on the wrist and get deported.What is the difference between ';identity theft'; and ';using false documents';?
';false documents'; don't necessarily involve using anyone else's identity; they could be a made up identity, or the holder's real identity but showing a false status, eg drivers license, passport.
Let us start with false documents. Using false documents means that a real person is using a fictitious document(s) to misrepresnt himself. example: Having a bogus drivers license (in your name) so you can drive. Or having a false US passport (in your name) so you can pass off as a US citizen.





Identity Theft. You will use the credit card, SSN, drivers license of another person to obtain material gain for yourself and to defraud the real person whose identity you have used.


Example: You find a credit card left on a store counter. You then use it to purchase goods. That is Identity Theft. No double standards here.
It's not a double standard. Recently they have been charged with identity theft also. You have to realize that the SSN's that are ';bought'; by an undocumented person don't always belong to somebody. That's not to say it never does. So, if a person is caught with a ';good'; number, then they WILL be charged with Identity theft.
Sometimes they make up new numbers which may 'surprise surprise!' belong to a living person, or not. Sometimes someone steals one so a name can be matched with the number. The last is most considered ID theft, though I think the one with the 'surprise' should be as well. The first, w/ no person at the other side of the number, is fake documents.





sometimes there is a difference - but only by luck.
when anyone, citizen or not, uses someone elses identity, it is identity theft. when you make up a phony name and number and create a document, thats using false papers or documents. not a double standard.
A false document could be one that doesnt steal another id. Its just false entirely ? Stop the northamericanunion...these illegal mexicans actually think that they hvae conquered america, when our government let them in and gave it to them,,they got all this FALSE PRIDE going on !! Threatening to kill off all the white europeans , instead of calling us what we are ,,,native americans ........follow these links everywhere they will take you and do internet research on all sites that want to stop the nau from the nau site...follow patriot sites, etc......youll find the reasons for the '; lies to the americans'; and why bush called our border patrol agents ,'; vigilantes';
Because they're ';just trying to make a better life for themselves';. Shame on you for not gleefully giving them your identity to do so.





sarcasm ~off~
false documents good just be fake. it doesn't have to be someone else's ID
Identity theft is when another person steals someone else's i.d. such as name, social security numbers, bank records,etc! This HURTS the real person! It messes up their credit rating. It gets them in trouble with the IRS, (for non-payment of taxes on the the money made by the criminal)This is a FELONY!





Using fake i.d.is also a felony, but at least (HOPEFULLY) no innocent person is hurt by this(other than the taxpayers)!!
identity theft is using someone else's id as your own; false documents is using fake documents i.e. a fake id with your name, but the wrong birth date or address.
when ur using false documents, u dont get cuaght unless ur teachers a wacko and is out to ruin ur life
  • hair highlights
  • Is it a false idea that God changes the rules from time to time?

    The popular notion is that under the old rules, animals were sacrificed and then God sent his Son to be sacrificed for the sins of man. (Please keep in mind, this popular gospel mentioned here is not the gospel Christ himself was preaching... his Kingdom gospel is timeless and was the same both before and after he preached it... click on my avatar if you want more context on this original gospel)





    So is the popular idea that God changed the rules 2000 years ago correct...





    or are the rules from God timeless an non-changing?Is it a false idea that God changes the rules from time to time?
    Both Jesus and animal sacrifice have been thought of as propitiation to alleviate suffering. This concept was made up by the ego that wants to perpetuate separation from God instead of amend our connection.





    That people react strongly to changing this relationship of our sinfulness and God and what they believe Jesus had to do to correct it is shown in this recent answer I gave.





    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…





    Mankind's consciousness does change but that is made on partial knowledge, not full truth.. God is the same as Jesus and ourselves because He made us as he is. The same, yesterday, today and forever.





    Jesus died or gave up his flesh so he could resurrect and show we are not our bodies, we are spirit as God is..Is it a false idea that God changes the rules from time to time?
    It is common for humans to want to impart very human characteristics to their conception of God (i.e. God is mad, sad, angry, vengeful, depressed, hateful of gays, etc.). In order to know if God changes the rules from time to time, we'd have to agree on what those rules are, and, let's face it, there's not a lot of agreement about that. However, it would seem to me that God is not so limited that he is incapable of changing the rules if he wants to. Maybe what we might consider is not whether God can change the rules, but, rather, are we going to respond to those perceived changes with love? Best wishes!
    Almighty God chose long ago to reveal Himself to modern man in phases and stages - thus the Old and New Testaments. This is also why He eventually chose to bring the Gentiles into His fold along with the faithful sons of Abraham and to use a Jew to minister unto them (Paul as you know). It is faith that catches God's holy eye.





    His ultimate plan all along was to bring all mankind (';adam';) back to His side to dwell with Him in Paradise once again (first Eden then heaven)
    The Old Testament God was perfectly suited to the times, since it was an era of blood sacrifice, envy, jealousy, revenge and hatred.


    All that shows is that people conceived of God as being like them.


    Even the Greeks thought of their gods as having all the failings of a human being.
    no it's false, because the Jews needed the blood of someone or something spotless to take away their sins so the goats and animals took the place of Jesus, until He came, then He, the only Spotless One took our place, and got rid of our stains. They have not changed.
    The living god of the Jews who was called El in Abraham's time, the one who savored the sweet smell of the roasting meats did ask Abraham to sacrifice his son, but relented. Remember that it is said that when Jesus was dieing on the cross he spoke the words ';father why have you forsaken me';
    No, God doesn't change His mind. Although we may not understand Him, we can't then just say simply He changes his mind. Our Lord Jesus Christ said he did not come to change but to complete. That's all. If you take an Old Testament story and a New Testament story, you can see the evolution of God's plan but not the contradiction. For example, thou shalt not commit adultery evolves into ';If a man so much as lusts in his heart, he has committed adultery.'; The basic idea is we are now held to a much higher standard now that God Himself took flesh and came down to teach us.
    Lakely if there is a God then you can surely find the answer in his word. Yes the Sacrifices were a shadow of the coming of the Lamb of God as foretold by David, Abraham and Isaiah and John the Baptist and the prophets ..God Bless, Lakely pray for understanding.








    Jesus said











    John 6:51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.





    What of these words of Jesus are you not understanding?





    God has never changed but God changes us through the atonement of Jesus Christ.
    My friend, Malachi 3:6 states that ';I am God, I change not.'; Jesus preached mostly from the Old Testament. Take this for example. There are ten commandments in the Old Testament. Jesus says there are two. Love the Lord with all your heart, mind, body, and soul. The second one is to Love your neighbor as yourself. Think about it. If you love your neighbor as yourself, and Love God above all else, then you keep the ten commandments. May God Bless You. If you ever need anything, my e-mail is themark08@yahoo.com.
    No God did not change the rules. He still needed a spotless sacrifice and so Jesus became that sacrifice so that we can enter into the Holy of Holies. The blood and the water came out of His side, remember? The free gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord not the water like your profile states. The blood cleanses us from Sin and the water represents the washing away of our old life into our newly regenerated life.
    God's government is timeless and unchanging. The human condition is not God's handy work, nor are human views sustained by Truth.
    Jesus fulfilled the O.T. and He became the ultimate sacrifice, there was no need for animal sacrifices after Jesus came....


    God is the same yesterday, today and forever.....
    Ya God has gotten a little more lenient than in the past with the rules according to the church.
    Only God decides.
    The bible contradicts it's self so that christians can argue one point or the other.
    He can do as He pleases and He Never Changes in the first place! (Humans change!)
    Which god are you talking about? There are thousands,,,,,all make believe
    God's perspective on sin are timeless and non-changing; the rules concerning the penalties for sin are unchanging. The worldly consequences of sin are unchanging - sin brings death to the flesh.





    God did not change the rules, He changed the way man responds to sin - changed from the shedding of the blood of animals to repentance and renewal of your spirit through Jesus Christ. he did not ';make up'; new rules, but followed through on what He said He would do - through the seed of Abraham, all the world is blessed; those who bless Him are blessed, and those who curse Him are cursed.





    Will the ';rules'; change again? Yes, God tells us this in Revelations. Though sin will always produce death, God will eliminate sin and eliminate death by taking away flesh. If you read Revelation 20-21, we are given spiritual bodies not of earthly flesh so we can have eternal lives without death.





    God is a God of change - He Himself does not change because He is perfect, but He changes and brings change to His creation.

    What is the history behind those personalities who exude false confidence and uses fear to get their way?

    How did this begin?What is the history behind those personalities who exude false confidence and uses fear to get their way?
    Well, this concept sums up the feminist movement. Men are fearful of looking @ women the wrong way in the workplace, fearful of getting falsely accused of rape (a huge huge huge issues) , and fearful of marriage because courts threat them like 4th class scum.





    BTW, to answer your specific question, the Alpha male (or the feminist enemy) has been phazed out of society. Reason for you to celebrate.What is the history behind those personalities who exude false confidence and uses fear to get their way?
    The opposite of the history of people who are intimidated by others confidence and are easily frightened by them.
    It began at the beginning.......

    Will society ever rise up and give up worshiping false gods?

    Meaning all make believe external invisible entities which leave no trace but what we imagine with our animal senses. Every generation is born stupid and absorbs the myths taught to them. When will this cycle ever be broken? Instead everyone seems to argue back and forth on Yahoo Answers about it. When will people live in peace or are we just apes using tools and religion is just one, one to get ahead, to fit in and to push various fears and agendas?Will society ever rise up and give up worshiping false gods?
    because people need hope, and sometimes believing in something foolish is better than believing in nothing at allWill society ever rise up and give up worshiping false gods?
    Why do we need to give up our spiritual beliefs to live in peace with each other?





    Honestly, what we need to give up is simply the arguing over who's right and who's wrong. The answer is all of us, and none of us. We need to be more tolerant and respectful of each other despite differences, because no matter what, no two people on earth are going to be exactly the same. We need to get our noses out of the personal business of our neighbors and put our priorities in proper order.





    This includes you - your calling others stupid for having spiritual beliefs is, acting like you are superior for your lack belief in any deities, is only adding to the problem, not working toward the solution. ';We must *be* the change we wish to see in the world'; -Mahatma Gandhi





    So, if you're not going to give up your arrogance, then do you really have the right to complain about others for the same?

    I have been falsely accused of touching a woman's daughter. Can I sue her for false accusations?

    I worked at a preschool this past summer teaching kids ages 6 and under how to swim. A woman has falsely accused me of touching her daughter which is impossible because the teachers and my boss were always around watching. I really want to sue her for false accusations because she could ruin my life with these false accusations.I have been falsely accused of touching a woman's daughter. Can I sue her for false accusations?
    Of course you can sue for slanderous comments she has made. Whether you can win a lawsuit is a question best asked when you consult your attorney.





    You would NEVER sue under these circumstances without an attorney, because pro se plaintiffs so rarely win.





    Ask your attorney for advice about your options.I have been falsely accused of touching a woman's daughter. Can I sue her for false accusations?
    surely before anything happened over your job the allegation would have to be looked into first to see if there was anything in it, if so then it would come out as untrue.





    If you were indeed following regulations and there was another member of staff present (as there should have been) to back you up you have nothing to worry about.





    If you do lose your job yes you could sue, but you would have to be able to prove it was a false allegation, and consider if the money spent is actually worth what you'd get back.





    This is why you make sure you are never alone with a child - child says something, just your word against theirs, and unfortunately nearly all parents and institutions would rather be safe than sorry.
    Yes, you can sue almost anybody for almost anything.





    The questions are these... Can you afford the attorney fees? Assuming you win, can you collect anything from this person? A multi-million dollar judgment against a person living in Section 8 Housing with a minimum wage job at WalMart is worthless.
    .


    Sure!


    .


    This is America! You sue anybody for anything.


    .


    Now, about that little, teensy-weensy matter of winning? Not so easy.


    .


    Good Luck.


    .
    If her accusation actually does stop you from getting a job then yeah, and if you're not InLove27 with that little girl.

    You can always judge a person's character based on how they treat animals. True or false?

    Depending on if they are kind to animals or not.You can always judge a person's character based on how they treat animals. True or false?
    False. Queen Elizabeth II is a dog-loving btch.





    (no pun intended ^^)You can always judge a person's character based on how they treat animals. True or false?
    I think true. An example is if a child/teenager is mean to animals or kills wild animals just for the heck of it, it's an early sign he will grow up to become a serial killer or soemthing along those lines. I think if you can't be kind to an animal, there has to be a lot wrong with your character.
    Well, research shows that if a child is cruel to or tortures animals he/she is in deep psyche trouble. And there are all kinds of therapeutic programs of caring for animals for deeply troubled kids. I would never trust someone who abuses animals. If they will an animal they will anyone they deem vulnerable.
    For me true. If someone is neglectful or cruel to animals it is a reflection of their character, especially their ability to show compassion. And it is a known fact that people who mistreat animals are more likely to be violent to people.
    I'm gonna say false, because while I think how someone treats animals can be a good way to judge their character, it isn't always reliable because many people are not comfertable around animals and don't know how to treat them.
    I think that it really depends on the person. I would think that usually I do not like the person and think that they tend to have a mean personality but some people can always be different
    I guess its pretty true.


    Like if you see a person feed a stray cat or pets animals nicely, they must be good hearted nice people.


    But if theyll scolding their pet or anything they seem like...grumpy or spoiled people.
    For the most part, I would agree with that statement. If people have no regard for life that's not human, then that says volumes about how they think.
    false, some people care for animals but hate people,it depends on who your judging for...(animals or people)
    false.....


    because some cruel people love their pets...sometimes even more than they love people
    It depends
    i think true.

    Is it legal for news outlets to keep posting false headlines?

    For example all the headlines were that the ';BODY'; of the missing grad student from Yale was found in the lab building. I kept reading the articles wondering why they didn't describe the condition it was found in and the details. One hour later and the headlines all read Evidence Seized but Still No Sign of Missing Student with the identical articles below. Should they not be fined for false headlines?Is it legal for news outlets to keep posting false headlines?
    the news has become more of a social gathering of opinions, nothing substantial is reported - who ever has the loudest mouth or the most plastic face and breasts gets to tell the 'news'...notice how they nw report from couches set up to look like fancy living rooms!?


    geeez, people are so vain!


    can we please just get un biased information from you people with out all the drama and opinions of your ego.





    this is why you should never expect to be told the truth, they do not know how to report the truth, only their opinions, what they are told to report, nothing factual, only drama to evoke some feeling to increase ratings for their news SHOW.





    As far as newspapers are concerned, they are more reliable however accountability is not an option, so for those headlines you speak of, protection of speech favors them in this case...?Is it legal for news outlets to keep posting false headlines?
    It is not responsible, but the press rushes to get the ';news'; out first. They hope they're right. It is not illegal and there are no fines for getting it wrong. I believe the idea is the media lives on their reputation for accuracy and that will keep them from making big mistakes. But in the last decade it seems that people move on to the next story so fast that fact checking has frequently gone by the wayside .
    Maybe it should be a fine for misinformation, but the only problems with that is that the News is out to get whatever they can as fast as they can. So because they don't do their research a lot of times they get it wrong.





    Kinda like President Obama does when he is trying to shove all these programs of his through without knowing what is actually in them and how they are going to work.
    The news has been reporting all morning that a body was found on campus. Then I watched a news conference saying no body was found. The poor student's family must be frantic. No one can seem to get it straight.





    We have freedom of the press and they cannot be fined, unfortunately.
    I like Hopes answer, it is more of a social Society thing now, that they are run by Obama.
  • hair highlights
  • Is it possible that since millions believe in a false god that there is a real god anyway?

    Just because people who believe in god, or don't believe, in god has absolutly no bearing on whether god exists or ';not';.Is it possible that since millions believe in a false god that there is a real god anyway?
    if you read your bible then you know there is god , just look arround you , look at this world, look at all the bad things that happen everyday, brother will go against brother friends agains friends, look at all the killings, read the bible it says that in there it all will come to past close to the end and as you can see alot has already come to past, yes there is a god the only God, our father in Heaven the son the father and the holy spirit, i will pray for you and hope to see you in Heaven, god bless you poor soul, your lostIs it possible that since millions believe in a false god that there is a real god anyway?
    The so called ';proof'; is only in our ';dreams';!
    Sure only the definition will change. If we discover that god exists then others will say that it is not god and then define god as something else, if for no other reason then they are able to do so.
    OMG i think about this all the time. if, for thousands of years, billions of people have had hundreds of different ideas of what, or who, GOD is, whose to say what is right? whose to say there really is a god anyways? im not a proclaimed atheist, i attended church growing up, but im just not sure if i believe...?
    I agree---never say never

    Australian Foreign Affairs Minister, Alexander Downer should be dropped off a bridge, true or false ?

    A disgrace to Australia, as our Foreign Affairs Minister, all he wants to do is bow down to all the Asian countries, try ever so patiently not to offend and lacks the courage to stand and put our views across to a recalcitrant Northern Neighbour ! He belongs in fishnet stockings and not embarassing Australia with hes empathic dribbling anymore.Australian Foreign Affairs Minister, Alexander Downer should be dropped off a bridge, true or false ?
    True and make sure he has his microphone and fishnet stockings with him just think he was in line to be our Prime Minister aren't we lucky we didn't get stuck with him for 11 yrs.


    I still can't believe he represents our country overseas.Australian Foreign Affairs Minister, Alexander Downer should be dropped off a bridge, true or false ?
    He belongs in fishnet stockings ~~~~~~~~~





    wayne ... you and i don't often agree ... but in this case !!!!





    :)
    No - because there is a chance he might survive.


    We need our Asian neighbours somewhat but in their cultures they do not respect suckups. They respect people who are tough, like Keating who had the guts to stand up to Mahatir.
    False. I still remember years ago when Downer attended a conference on violence against women. It was full of women who were there to campaign against violence. He made the offensive joke ';Violence against women...the things that batter';.





    So, no, he should not be thrown off a cliff. I think he should have to live with someone who is violent towards him and then have to hear jokes about it.





    He is a disgrace to all Australians

    What female health problems could cause a false positive on an otc pregnancy test?

    I'm not having a scare - it's for deus ex machina in a story I'm writing.What female health problems could cause a false positive on an otc pregnancy test?
    Some tumors in women will express hCG, which is the hormone pregnancy tests look for. Also, a woman with a hydatiform mole will have loads of hCG in her blood stream. A hydatiform mole forms from an implanted zygote with incorrect DNA, due to a number of possible errors that could have occured in the fertilization process and the final meiotic division of the ovum. The zygote will go on to form the trophoblastic cells that make hCG, but not the embryo. There may be other conditions, but those are the only two I'm aware of.What female health problems could cause a false positive on an otc pregnancy test?
    there are no problems in women taht would cause that, only testicular cancer in men will cause a positive pregnancy test...

    HOW or WHEN does having false beliefs make one a false Christian?

    ';Jesus said to him, “If I will that he remain till I come, what is that to you? You follow Me.”


    Then this saying went out among the brethren that this disciple would not die. Yet Jesus did not say to him that he would not die, but, “If I will that he remain till I come, what is that to you?”'; (John 21:22, 23 NKJV)





    Were the disciples who misunderstood Jesus' words, concluding that John would not die, false Christians?HOW or WHEN does having false beliefs make one a false Christian?
    The wrong conclusion that those believers jumped to was not an article of faith that determines whether a person is a Christian or not. There is only one article of faith that makes a person a Christian - that only faith in what Jesus accomplished at Calvary will save anyone from their sins. Anybody who trusts in anything other than faith in Christ for their salvation remains unsaved. Nobody can come to God with anything in their hand, to offer as a contribution towards forgiveness and salvation. ';Just as I am, without one plea, but that your blood was shed for me'; goes the old hymn.





    A person could claim to believe a whole raft of biblical doctrines yet still not be a Christian! You see, Christianity is not a head-trip. It's a heart transplant, and only humble, total faith, will bring about the miracle of a heart that beats for God. Once God brings a spiritually dead person to spiritual life (the new birth Jesus spoke of in John chapter 3), then they have become a Christian. Thereafter, they grow in knowledge and understanding. It cannot work the other way around!





    The disciples who misunderstood Jesus' words did so because they had wrong expectations for how the Kingdom of God would be manifested. Throughout the centuries, many Christians have fallen into the same trap, yet that did not cast them out of the Kingdom! They were going beyond the things written; they were not minding their Christian business (because they were making judgments and pontificating on inappropriate matters). They had, however, put all their faith in Christ to be saved, and that cannot be done by a false Christian. Actually, there is no such thing as a false Christian. Once a person becomes a Christian, they are a Christian, pure and simple. The world is full of pseudo-Christians, however; those who claim to be Christians but who have not yet been born again of the Holy Spirit. Christians can be mistaken about many things, but if they have been born again of the Holy Spirit, they remain Christians, their mistakes being sorted out as they grow in grace. It's believing you don't have to be born again that is the hallmark of false Christianity.HOW or WHEN does having false beliefs make one a false Christian?
    It's one thing to misunderstand issues that have no bearing on salvation.





    It's another thing to not believe the right things for salvation.





    If a person rejects the truth that Jesus is God, and/or rejects the Trinity, or if the person adds works to faith alone in Jesus for salvation, then the person is unsaved.





    They don't have to be unsaved. The truth about Jesus is that the only way to be saved and to get into heaven and avoid being sent to eternal hell, is by believing in faith alone that Jesus, who is God, died on the cross for our sins as FULL PAYMENT for all our sins, and then Jesus rose from the dead (1 Corinthians 15:1-4). Believe in Jesus alone for salvation, and you will be in heaven, no matter what! Salvation is a FREE GIFT that happens in a split second when you believe in Jesus alone to save you! It is impossible to lose or ';leave'; salvation (John 6:39-40, John 10:28, 1 John 5:13).
    ';False belief'; is an oxymoron.





    The attributes of TRUTH and FALLACY can only be assigned to facts and logical conclusions.





    BELIEF/FAITH is a matter of personal insight or leanings.


    As such, it has nothing to do with facts or logical conclusions.
    John 17:3 makes it quite clear


    3 Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent





    If you don't know the truth it would appear eternal life is not what you will get.
    when one is not born again..

    Is it considered harassment to me, if somebody keeps ringing my employer and making false complaints about me?

    A certain person is trying to get me sacked by continually phoning my employer and making false statements about me. Is this harrasment %26amp; what can I do about it?Is it considered harassment to me, if somebody keeps ringing my employer and making false complaints about me?
    Yes this is harassment. If you know who is calling then you can sue for defamation of character, but you will have to prove that it was a certain person and that what they said affected your job. If you don't know who is making the false complaints there is nothing you can really do.Is it considered harassment to me, if somebody keeps ringing my employer and making false complaints about me?
    You betcha! Go directly to your employer and ask for a few minutes to talk to him.
    Yes it is harassment. I would stop by my local police station and get their advice. Good luck.
    Yes, but unless you can figure out who this person is, I'd say you can do nothing about it. If you do know who it is, you can sue, but proving the case will be difficult.
    YES!! call teh police and ahve them tap the Boss's phone (w/ bosses knowledge and agreement) and figure it out!!





    then file CHARGES!!
    thats not exactly harrasment but u should alert your manager and talk to the person you think is doing this

    Why do christians accuse teachings of being false when they cant follow them?

    i mean in christianity women are told to keep quiet in church ...dress modestly etc u know ....so why the hell do christians say that jesus never said that i mean wtfWhy do christians accuse teachings of being false when they cant follow them?
    One word- Hypocrisy.Why do christians accuse teachings of being false when they cant follow them?
    Because Christians are crazy and follow a religion that makes no sense.
    Christianity and other organized religion is more about what the people say than what God says.
    Christianity is a false religion, scientist and science have always proved them wrong.
  • hair highlights
  • If issued a marriage license based on false documents, can the marriage be annulled?

    If someone submits falsified documents in order to get a marriage license, can the marriage license be annulled? False birth certificate and I.D. were used (not by me..)If issued a marriage license based on false documents, can the marriage be annulled?
    Actually, it needs to be annulled to get the marriage off the books. Unless you do, the government will see you as married and you can't file your taxes as single.If issued a marriage license based on false documents, can the marriage be annulled?
    If you had no knowledge of the false documents then yes, the person who falsified the documents or forms can get charged with a crime.





    It's not an annullment when this happens though because the marriage was never legal in the 1st place as it was obtained through fraud.





    In order for it to be annulled it has to be valid legally. basically same result though but under a different name
    It doesn't need to be annulled because it wasn't a legal marriage to begin with. Point it out to officials and your marriage is void.

    What is the science involved in the false reality of the ';Matrix'; films?

    I was wondering if anyone knew if there is any science behind the ultra-realistic dream world that the characters in the matrix experienced when they had that needle stuck in their neck and their brain was told that it was somewhere that it wasn't. Is this possible? Is there any information on this field available? What are your thoughts about this technology in the future, even perhaps in a recreational form, like the next big thing in video game simulation or something?What is the science involved in the false reality of the ';Matrix'; films?
    Well the Matrix was about a simulated reality created by sentient machines to pacify and make use of the human population as an energy source like when Morphis told Neo that the human race would be compared to a battery in the Matrix. Cybernetics is defined as the study of feedback and derived concepts such as communication, and contol of living organisms, machines and organizations. I think this science best describes the happenings in the movie the Matrix because the ';machines'; were trying to take control of all three concepts mentioned in the Cybernetics definition. I know Cybernetics is used in data storage and there is something called Psycho Cybernetics which claims to hypnotize people out of bad habits, to improve one self esteem, and to acquire any skill a person wants. I think Psycho Cybernetics can be compared to the part in the Matrix where Trinity did not know how to fly a helicopter. Then a computer program on flying a helicopter was ran through her, and instantly, through the program, she knew how to fly the helicopter.What is the science involved in the false reality of the ';Matrix'; films?
    i very much liked the first matrix (pop buddist theory), however did not care much for the second movie which led me to not want to watch the third movie.


    so, in my opinion those movies aren't necessarily commenting on future sciences and technologies but exploring theology/philosophy.
    I haven't heard of anything like this being developed, but I think that we could reach a point where this could be possible. The brain basically operates on electrical impulse, if we could figure out a way for a computer to generate the electrical impulses needed to create a ';false reality'; then I think it's plausible. Then we would could use computer programs to tell us different things. I guess we would have to employ some sort of real time computer programming and we'd have to figure out how to make the computer respond to our brain's own electrical impulses.


    But I don't think this technology is within out reach in our lifetime.

    Help!! How can I find out if I can really sing? I don't want to be one of those people with false hopes.?

    I attend a conservatory for voice. I am being trained in opera. I don't know if I truly have the talent to become successful in the future. Should I put a video of myself on youtube to find out? Some people give you compliments just to be nice. I need a reality check. People have said that I have a beautiful voice, yet I have doubts. To their ears it might sound good, but what about in the real world. Do I have great talent? How can I find out?Help!! How can I find out if I can really sing? I don't want to be one of those people with false hopes.?
    try the video and ask people what they think of itHelp!! How can I find out if I can really sing? I don't want to be one of those people with false hopes.?
    youtube is a good choice or just go on America's Idol...
    One of the best things you can learn is how to be objective about your own talent. So, I would make a recording of your voice and listen to yourself. Since you are studying at conservatory, I would ask you to listen to the voices of the great performers and hear the qualities of their voices that make them great. Aim there. Aim high. Try to be as objective as you can and listen to your own voice. You'll often see performers when they are rehearsing wear earpieces or cup their ears - they are listening to the quality of their voice. It is very easy to have doubts and to have fears. Ask your teachers and coaches as well. Sometimes they can be wrong or too critical, but hearing what they say is important as well. What I'd like to ask you is what the audition process is for conservatory, and if you made that grade I think you have a fighting chance - if you are willing to work for it. Accomplishment often comes with hard work and being honest with yourself. I personally would love to hear you...and I wish you the best.
    ';Youtube'; is not going to get you the information you seek... I assume you want to go into opera since that's what your training involves. Have you contacted any of the regional opera companies in your area? Ask about their ';general'; or ';open'; auditions and tell them you want a hearing. (They may even let you submit a good DVD or video and give you feedback.) A good voice teacher at a conservatory can also help you network this as well. The bottom line is get feedback from opera professionals because they are the ones who will be considering you for singing jobs in the future. Good luck!
    Listen to Sistermusic--she hit it right on the nose. If you already have been accepted in a conservatory for voice and am being trained for opera, your teachers must think you have some talent (unless you're enrolled in Jack's Conservatory of Music and Auto Repair Salon). Absolutely check into auditions, regional competitions, etc. Try out for a group like the Houston Grand Opera Studio, whose alumni include Erie Mills, Eugene Perry, Denyce Graves, and Ana Maria Martinez. Let a professional hear you--YouTube is a lot of fun, but you're not going to get the opinion that will really count.
    your teachers should be able to tell you, if you look them square in the eye and ask for the truth. They have experience in it.





    Don't bother with youtube. The sound reproduction is a nightmare and can never do you justice. Join a choral group. Sing for fun and experience. You'll get the idea as you go, and trust your teachers.
    You should get a recorder. They can play back your voice when you sing so you can figure out what parts of your voice to change(or not!)
    dont say u cant.if u say u cant then u have a better chance of giving up. there is this girl Holly Stell and she is a great opera singer. look her up. buy her cd. sing to it. thats how i got better. plus dont be afraid of wat other people might say just do wat u wanna do and dont let any1 get in the way. if u say u can do it than u can. go to a local choir teacher. at a middle school or highschool and u can sing for them. they wont be harsh like simon on americn idol but they wont be dishonest. they will tell u wat u need to improve. takenotes and ask wat u can do to improve it.
    same, I'd love to you hear you. I should tell you that I will be honest. At the same time, I am not obnoxious or some critic. I only rely on the truth and like to give helpful feedback for your benefit. Just post the link.





    Also, be a bit optimistic. It's good to know the truth- it ain't easy. But determination will take you far.
    record yourself and upload it to daretosing.com


    ask for criticism and you'll get it.
    Use your recorder.





    Hide it in a room, and invite a bunch of friends over to listen to you sing. Halfway through the song, leave the room abruptly. Don't ask for any opinions at all.


    After about 10 - 15 minutes, allow your friends to leave the room, stop the recording, rewind and then listen to what your friends said while you were outside.
    i suffer from the same thing...i say that you should record yourself and take it to a vocal coach and see what they have to say and how you can improve....thats crazy you say that because i was just goin through the same issue
    One of the big problems that you face is that after a certain level of musicality, it's more about the unique qualities of your voice that make you appealling rather than how well you meet a standard. Some may like your voice, some may not. Classical music is an ugly creature, it's really up to the definite few to decide whether they like your voice or not, or whether you have what it takes... and often what it takes is centered more on an over all image of whether you will pull in money and attention or whether you won't.





    I dealt with this same problem for a big part of my life until I realized that I didn't actually want to be in the world of opera- I love operas- and I teach them now to students, and find great value in them- but if you get too close, you get some distortion, you can't see straight in the fog of what's really important and what's not. And before you realizing it, you're selling yourself on the street, begging that the next old lady with 10 million dollars will fall in love with you- and make you a star.... a star, by the way, only to that old lady and Opera News.





    If you pursue music, and study and become musical, there will be jobs for you. The world still needs good musicians. But if you aim for some lofty position more for the validation than anything else, you will always fall short until you realize the validation was never real to begin with.
    post up the link to the video, here on yahoo answers. ill tell you

    Why do angry, desperate republicans think that false registrations equals voter fraud?

    Is someone registering as Mickey Mouse really going to show up at the polls with ID saying ';Mickey Mouse'; and get to cast a vote?Why do angry, desperate republicans think that false registrations equals voter fraud?
    my husband and i printed out our voter registration on line and mailed it in. 5 business days later, bingo! card in hand. where we live, you do not have to present i.d. if you have your voter registration card with you, although the workers are supposed to compare signatures. can you seriously not see how voter fraud could be carried out? Why do angry, desperate republicans think that false registrations equals voter fraud?
    They've got to keep up the outrage of the base.
    Only a Republican would secretly join ACORN, and then make a mistake that obvious. If they really were trying to falsify registations, it wouldn't be that blatant.
    I'd like to see someone show up and vote as ';Joey's Pizzeria'; or any of those nonsensical fake registrations.





    It's not like these fake registrations are going to CAST VOTES. Who exactly is going to show up and cast a vote for Donald Duck?





    This happens EVERY election. I don't know why suddenly it is in the national spotlight. Maybe because Obama is so far ahead in the polls and the Republicans have little else to advertise?





    It's not like ACORN has been taking people OFF of voter rolls like Republicans have done in the past in other states (FL 2000). THAT would be objectionable.
    You said it, they are angry and desperate, and have nothing worthwhile to say, except slander and hate.
    You must have led a very sheltered life.





    People register to vote at non-existent addresses or at places where they don't live. Or they register in 10 or 20 different precincts.


    ACORN turns in 200,000 of these at the last minute so that the Democratic Sec'ty of State in Ohio can say ';Oh, we can't possibly check them all in time!'; The courts allow her to get away with it.


    ACORN could have turned them in bit by bit as they registered people but they did this on purpose to OVERWHELM the system and create CHAOS.


    This allows the people who registered MULTIPLE times to VOTE multiple times.


    Fake names, fake addresses, dead people, who cares?





    They do NOT need ID - because that's ';voter suppression'; according to Democrats.


    I have NEVER been asked for an ID in my life.


    There are dead people on the voter rolls in my precinct.


    People who moved years ago.


    Some of them come back to vote and visit their old neighbors.


    Then they vote again in the suburb that they moved to.


    Vote early, vote often.





    This does NOT happen except in States, counties and precincts where there are Democrats in charge of elections.


    Welcome to the REAL world.





    They just throw in Mickey Mouse so that you THINK this is frivolous.


    It's a THREAT to our Democracy.
    Obama's campaign workers are pulling their votes because they were illegal. That is voter fraud.
    Not every state requires ID. Not every poll worker is honest.





    Why would you even defend any kind of fraud?
    It's true. Not every voting place requires ID in order to cast the ballot. Now do you see why voter registration fraud can lead to voter fraud?
    First of all Obama Who needs to chill. Personal attacks have no place in this forum.





    Secondly, If this is not an issue, why is the FBI investigating in at least 20 states?





    Rage, you seem to be the angry one.
    The differences are too complex for reptile brains capable of handling the mere basics: ';kill,'; ';eat'; and ';reproduce.';
    They aren't very informed.


    Every group that registers voters has declined registrations for all kinds of reasons.


    The GOP knows this, so that is why they made a big deal of it. If you notice, the states that they are making a big deal of it, are the ones that have laws requiring every registration filled out be submitted whether the group turning them in knows they are bad or not.





    Republicans think it will tie up the registration process to prevent people who are trying to keep Bush III from winning, enough so they can''t vote, along with being able to swift-boat Obama with it.





    Realistically speaking, they are probably only using the Obama swift boat to cover up their real agenda of preventing people from registering and voting.


    Minority voter turn out works in Republican favor. Large voter turn-out usually doesn't.
    They are just getting itchy because they know they cheated in the last 2 elections and they are afraid the Democrats will pull the same crap. Since they can't pull it this time.





    Republicans are sore losers. The war in Iraq is evidence of that.
    Why would you waste paper on false registrations? I though democrats were behind the ';Green'; movement.
    When some people vote as many as 72 times, it is a pretty clear indication that there is fraud going on.
    Many states don't require a picture ID. It has happened before
    False registrations my butt, there is voter fraud going on and it has already being proven. Liberals you all make me sick

    Can you do anything legal in KY for not being hired due to a false positive drug test?

    I failed a drug test, urine analysis, and I know that I do nothing, so i was wanting to know if there is any legal action that I can take against the company that will not hire me because of the drug test. I can take a hair follicle test to prove that I have done nothing... What is your opinion? thanks. i am very frustrated!Can you do anything legal in KY for not being hired due to a false positive drug test?
    When pre-employment drug screens are done and a positive test result occurs, the lab automatically does a second test from the sample provided by the person to rule out a possible ';false positive';. If the second test also comes back positive, then the employer is notified as such %26amp; you don't get hired.


    If you are 110% sure that you had NOTHING in your system that would cause the test to come back as positive, then contact the company's HR Dept and ask them what your options are to contest the results.


    And eating a muffin, bagel or sandwich that has poppy seeds on it will not cause the test to pop a false positive. The amount of poppy seeds coating the bread versus the amount required to register- you would be sick from overeating before that occured.Can you do anything legal in KY for not being hired due to a false positive drug test?
    You can not sue the company if they consistently follow their drug testing policy. You at best can get an accurate test done and then sue the company that gave the false test for the cost incurred by you getting an accurate test. How is the company you are applying to doing anything wrong as long as they do not hire anyone that fails a drug test? It is not their fault.





    If you think you can pass a hair test because you bleached your hair they are on to those kind of tricks if you show up with obviously treated hair they will use hair from a different part of your body.





    I tend to believe false positive drug tests are like people in prison there are some innocent people but a very small percentage of those that claim it.





    I don't mean to imply that you are not innocent just to advise you if you are looking for a way to beat the system it is not as easy as people think it is.
    Nope, you cannot.





    No company i know of, ever sends pre employment drug test, to a lab for verification of positive readings.





    You might be able to approach the company, , and offer to pay for lab verification of your drug test..





    Your problem is going to be, most company pre employment drug test, only measure drugs that have been gotten in your system, within the last couple of days.





    They do not test positive for drug use that was weeks or months old, that would show up on a lab test.





    And they destroy those urine samples immediantly.





    So they would not still have them to verify by sending it to a lab.






    take another drug test. don;t wait 3 months later, that won;t count. Besides, the machine has no clue what a false postive is. That's a human created term often used as a dodge to avoid what the machine says is correct. Your only chance is to claim eating poppy seeds in a muffin if the machine tested positive for opium. Else, turn out the lights, the party is over. %26lt; As the song goes......
    Were you taking any non prescription drugs,over the counter medications, etc.??? And did you mention it to the testing center???

    Are Liberals personal lifes so empty that they need to fill it with a false prophet like Obama?

    Holy crap guys, it's the President of the US, not the freaking second coming. You people need God in your life.Are Liberals personal lifes so empty that they need to fill it with a false prophet like Obama?
    lol. And what do you have to be proud of?


    Reagan? Bush? BUSH!? Dont be jealous.





    WE are just as happy to have Obama, as we are to get rid of BUSH. Get it right.Are Liberals personal lifes so empty that they need to fill it with a false prophet like Obama?
    lol correct


    and they also spend time trying to influence others about what republicans supposedly are complaining about when they are not complaining about it


    like this question


    why are the republicans so mad that blacks voted for obama ?


    i am a republican and never asked this question and doubt others did


    i would be surprised if blacks did not vote for obama
    Alot of them are acting like he is a Prophet


    for sure. I mean, my wife taped the


    inauguration and with the people chanting


    Obama Obama and just going crazy, I just


    shook my head.
    Who needs God when we have Obama? He is our savior, he'll save us all and give us all checks so we don't have to work another day in our lives.
    So true! The messiah-fication of Obama by the press and the rest of the Koolade drinkers is disturbing.
    Some people choose to admire a guy who is hugely ambitious and charming.





    Some others...seem to admire an imaginary friend written about by a peasant farmer in the Middle East 2000 years ago.
    Obama... not so much a part of my personal life, god however, is a different story.








    Christian liberal :)
    Nobody needs a fairy tale God in their lives, and some liberals need to stop worshipping Obama.
    NO HE'S THE MESSIAH HE WILL FIX EVERYTHING

















    CHAAAANGE CHAAAAANNNNGGGEEEEEE
    actually quite the opposite. I guarantee I did more before the age of 25 than you will do your entire life.
    Its idolatry. People have had idols for thousands of years. It makes them feel less scared in a scary world.
    Like Ann Coulter said, they are godless, so they worship a man.
    No we are doing just fine. Life is good.
    Hahaha no we're fine. =) Thanks for asking.
  • hair highlights
  • Anything in the law which states you not allowed to reject a customer 'on false grounds'?

    If a bar rejects someone 'on false grounds' - is this at least wrong?





    Or am I just too human?Anything in the law which states you not allowed to reject a customer 'on false grounds'?
    Uh no. Businesses reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. They don't actually have to provide grounds.Anything in the law which states you not allowed to reject a customer 'on false grounds'?
    There is an old federal law that prohibits the restriction of interstate trade.





    Seeing that a customer from another state can go into a bar, this is considered interstate trade.





    This law is what helped make Plessy v. Ferguson (separate but equal) a thing of the past.





    Technically, if you are being kicked out for any reason other than you're far too drunk, or you're being a nuissance, then yes, they're breaking the law.





    But it's the same type of dumb law as jaywalking, buying alcohol on a sunday morning, and such. They're not really a big deal. I say get over it and try again some other time. If a bouncer keeps pulling this ****, get a hold of the manager during the day and explain it to him. Bouncers and sometimes bartenders think they know people just by looking at their face. My friend with Bell's palsy CAN'T go into this one bar in the city because he looks drunk all the time (half his face is pseudo-paralyzed).
    Laws in each state are different. I can tell you that in Washington, where I am a police officer, a bar keep may tell anyone to leave the bar for any reason, or no reason at all. As the person in charge of the bar or owner of the business you have the right to refuse service to anyone with or without a reason. I would check your local state laws to be sure, but I would guess this law is pretty uniform from state to state
    You can reject for any reason or no reason at all. Correct or false it does not matter. The only exception is that you can not reject on the basis of Race, Religion, or Gender.
    a bar can refuse to serve anyone for any reason
    There are no false grounds it is totally up to the owners of the business.
    Here in Vermont a bar tender can refuse any one at any time without 'false grounds'.
    I think a bar can reject a customer for no reason at all
    They can refuse to serve you if you look funny

    Are the following biology questions true or false?

    1. A phospholipid molecule has a nonpolar water-insoluble head attached to a long polar, soluble trail.


    2. In animals, cholesterol strengthens the fluid mosaic and makes the plasma membrane more stable.Are the following biology questions true or false?
    true


    trueAre the following biology questions true or false?
    um um...im 0nly in 8 grade!
    dont know
    1.]false


    2.]true
    First is false; it's the other way around. second is true

    Which of the following statements is false concerning the molecules of life?

    a. They form spontaneously under current earth conditions.





    b. They are not stable in the presence of free oxygen.





    c. Cellular mechanisms safeguard these molecules.





    d. They control when cellular energy changes occur.





    e. They control where cellular energy changes occur.Which of the following statements is false concerning the molecules of life?
    A is false.. Organic molecules cannot form spontaneously under current earth conditions.. Urey %26amp; Miller showed that they could form spontaneously in the primitive earth's atmosphere.Which of the following statements is false concerning the molecules of life?
    a is wrong, spontaneous generation was proved wrong MANY years ago.
    letter f





    if this message appear under your query, then your question is the true and my answer is false.





    get it?

    Is it illegal to send a joke letter in the mail with a false return address?

    I want to send a joke letter to someone asking them to fill out a survey. There is nothing threatening, not asking for money, no vulgarity and the survey will not even be included for them to send back. So really the letter serves no purpose except to be kind of annoying.





    I'm wondering if it is illegal or not to put a fake return address with a fake name like Smith Research Institute. Is it considered some sort of fraud to be posing as a fake institute. Like I said, I wouldn't be asking for anything in response.Is it illegal to send a joke letter in the mail with a false return address?
    Yes, it is illegal. It is a felony, commonly known as ';mail fraud';.Is it illegal to send a joke letter in the mail with a false return address?
    not necessarilly mail fraud, but there are laws against deliberately annoying someone. I believe this was driven home by the history of annoy.com - you might want to check it out.

    Report Abuse



    Yes, it can be pursued legally! Usually it is pursued as ';harassment';. But, if someone is really pissed off and wants to make it a federal case, they'll prosecute for mail fraud.

    Report Abuse



    No, but kind of funny. It would only be a crime if you were trying to do it commit a crime. Have fun.
    as long as you don't ask for any personal information I think you're alright.
    Depends on the name you use any name that you use that is actually real that business could take offense but if you think up a corparate name and make sure it is not a real business then more power to you.

    The statement the rate of change of the rate of change of y equals y is a differential equation. True or False?

    I think the question is saying that the second derivative of y is equal to y. It would not be a differential equation since differential equations are asking for the original function. The statement already provides the original function. But I'm not sure if my reasoning is correct.Thanks. Any help and advice would be appreciated.The statement the rate of change of the rate of change of y equals y is a differential equation. True or False?
    This would be written as:





    y'' - y = 0





    This is most definitely a differential equation. It would be classified as a second-order, linear, homogeneous, ordinary differential equation with constant coefficents. The fact that is is a homogeneous equation with constant coefficents also implies that it is an autonomous equation;.





    Solving a differential equation means finding an expression that defines the dependent variable (in this case, y) in terms of the independent variable (in this case, time). The original differential equation does *not* provide a definition of y in terms of t.





    In this case, the general solution to the above differential equation is:





    y(t) = A*exp(-t) + B*exp(+t)





    where A and B are constants of integration that must be found from the initial conditions.

    Who do some people fall for false promises of 麓free麓 healthcare by Hillary?

    There is nothing free about 麓free麓 healthcare. Someone will have to pay for it. Why should I pay for your healthcare? Get your own.Who do some people fall for false promises of 麓free麓 healthcare by Hillary?
    People act positively to the word ';free';. It feels good to receive something that is conceived as such. What people aren't thinking about are the hidden costs of ';free'; items.





    When something is handed out for ';free';, the costs associated in researching, manufacturing and promoting the item are not contemplated. The fact that those costs are passed along to paying customers are not thought of.





    Countries where socialized healthcare is offered pay close to 40% in taxes yearly for this ';free'; healthcare (for those needing me to speak slower: for every $10 you make, $4 go to taxes). In addition, patients don't have a choice in their physician - you are assigned based on the neighborhood you live in. Unless you pay for ';private care'; (i.e., paying out of pocket), it may take you months to see a physician. Once you get in, the quality of care received isn't the same. The system in these countries have become so clogged with patients, that doctors are now delaying treatment to people who aren't urgent: the elderly, the obese, the smoker, etc. The rationale is that if you can't bother to take care of yourself, we won't bother treating you right away.





    While I believe a change in this area is needed, part of that change needs to be putting the doctors back in charge of patients' health, not for-profit insurance companies.





    ';If it sounds too good to be true, then it probably is.';Who do some people fall for false promises of 麓free麓 healthcare by Hillary?
    They've been sapped of their free will by the empty promises of 'Big Gubment'.





    I feel bad for them.
    because they are lazxy and selfish


    most people think that they have a right to the money you and I earn, just because they made bad decisions intheir lives or they are too lazy to actually work for something


    all of these entitlement prograsms are just vote buying schemes and the lazy scumbags that overpopulate our nation are more than happy to elect a commie that only seeks power if they can get some of your hardearned money for free


    the federal governments powers are clearly spelled out in the constitution and providing free healthcare to lazy vermin is not among their powers
    I was not surprised when the stats on Hillary voters came out - they tend to be less educated than Obama supporters. Sorry, but you'd have to be an idiot to believe anything that woman says. She says things that sound good to ';the little guy.'; But if they took the time to think about the logistics of all her ';free'; stuff, they'd realize she is full of horsey poo.
    Because these are the same sheep that think when the government needs money the government just prints it...they do not understand taxation and explaining it to them is a colossal waste of time.





    Obama's plan is not much better:





    Here's more to the Obama health plan, as described by Obama himself in the first democratic presidential debate. Summarized...Obama stipulates that the following four (4) parties will pay equally for his health plan:


    1. The Federal Government


    2. The State Governments


    3. Employers (Business)


    4. Employees (Consumers/Tax payers)





    Now I ask where does the Federal Government get its money? Answer by raising taxes. Who pays those taxes? You guessed it Employers and Employees. Where do the Employers get the money to pay the taxes? It's not comming out of their profits, so they raise the cost of the products/services they offer. Where do State Governments get their money? Yep, you guessed it by collecting taxes. Who pays those taxes? Once again it's the Employer and Employee. Do you really think that the Employers are going to cut into their profits for this tax? Nope that ';saving'; is passed onto the consumer (tax payer). How do the Employers make money? By selling good/services to the consumer (Employees/tax payers). So who is really paying for Obama's health care plan? The hard working, tax paying American citizen. Now do you really want to pick up the tab for all the free loaders (I'm not talking about retired seniors, you know people that have actually contributed) that either don't work, pay taxes, or some combination of both? Is it ';fair'; to make hard working, tax paying people pay for that burden?
    I will believe her for three months or until Denver
    They can't even track the money were supposed to get for Social Security and people want to buy into a National Health care program with the government in charge????





    How thick can you get????
    David you can find a job if you want to= go to wallmart to MacDonald's join the Army I'm sure they will take you real fast
    I cant. I don't have a job. I've been looking for a job since October and can't find one that provides health care benefits, so it's only fair that you and all the rest of the tax payers pay for mine.








    Martha: No one will hire me cause I weigh 400 lbs, I'm in my late 50s, and I have real bad arthritis in both knees, so I can't stand up all day like I would have to at WalMart or Mickey Ds. I can't work and I don't have any health insurance. Don't you think it's only right that taxpayers take care of me?
    The lazy slobs see EVERYTHING coming from the government to be ';free';. THEY have plenty of money.....





    Trouble is.... THEIR money is OUR TAXES.... and I pay too much.





    The last thing I want is to over pay for a service...but thats what you get. The average split for a government run project is - 20% to the intended purpose; 80% to the administration.





    That's a LOT of money that has to come in before you get $100 of ';free'; government aid..... but the lazy bums don't care. They stick their hands out without any hesitation.
    Because they would rather something be given to them instead of working for it.
    Because some day you may need to have health care as many people do in this country. Your Mr. Bush spent trillions of dollars on an illegal war. That could have been spent for health care for everyone for over 20 years. Think about that! Instead we got 4,000 dead soldiers and 40,000 wounded soldiers. Who pays for that???? Not to smart are you?
  • hair highlights
  • Which of the following statements are false?

    a. the universe has a specific amount of Energy


    b. one form of energy can be converted to other forms of energy


    c. whenever energy conversion occur, some energy is converted to less concetrated forms.


    d. once energy is utilized, it disapears


    e. there are differences in the quality of energy.Which of the following statements are false?
    D. conservation of matter and energy. they cannot disappearWhich of the following statements are false?
    As per the first law of thermodynamics, statement D is incorrect.





    Also, as per the first law of thermodynamics, Everlasting Gobstoppers really are ';everlasting';.

    How many ways are there to get 2 wrong on a true and false 10 question quiz?

    how does this affect all your answers?How many ways are there to get 2 wrong on a true and false 10 question quiz?
    This is a binomial problem.





    p (Correct) = 0.5


    p (Incorrect) = 0.5





    p (2 Incorrect) = (10C2) * ((0.5)^2) * ((0.5)^8)





    You can work that out on a calculator... Don't have one with me at the mo...How many ways are there to get 2 wrong on a true and false 10 question quiz?
    45 ways

    Twitter is for people with a false sense of own self importance? Yes or no?

    I say yes!





    No one cares about every little intricate trivial detail of your lives. Talk about a false sense of importance! Its borderline nauseating.





    Who is with me?Twitter is for people with a false sense of own self importance? Yes or no?
    I use twitter, but I mostly follow; I seldom send tweets of my own. Those I follow tend to be people, groups and organizations that I have a keen interest in, like @CatoInstitute, @RichardDawkins, @KurzweilAINews, and @dailygalaxy (to name but a few).





    I agree with you that it is narcissistic to tell the world about every little thing you do, but that's not the kind of tweet I'm interested in. I use twitter mostly for real news %26amp; information. Mostly....Twitter is for people with a false sense of own self importance? Yes or no?
    I agree. Yes.





    It is certainly for the own self importance.


    But more importantly, it tells us that its ok to put half-baked opinions on display.


    In old days, people spent decades before publishing anything of importance. That's why we had legendary writers. Twitterers are sadly lacking.
    it is as boring as listening to someone talk on a cell phone in a crowded room.





    people are extremely isolated and self absorbed - maybe someday they will wake up and talk to the people they are near or with.
    ';The vanity of others offends our taste only when it offends our vanity.';
    Having an opinion about twitter is for people with a false sense of self-importance.
    It seems to me it's just another way to keep in contact with friends.
    ...no - thanks for sharing...

    What are the best brands for false eyelashes?

    I don't want the super crazy bat lashes; just some false eyelashes that will give full long lashes that look somewhat natural.What are the best brands for false eyelashes?
    MAC makes good fake eyelashes (most are $10.00) and Shu Uemura makes amazing ones too, but the Shu ones can definitely be pricey


    _____________________What are the best brands for false eyelashes?
    My favourite just for day-to-day use are Ardell. They're great, easy to use, and wonderful lash shapes so the look is natural.





    I personally love individual lashes, but those can be hard to apply. Nevertheless, they're natural and look like you have a beautiful set of lashes!





    Duo is my favourite adhesive.





    I would NOT recommend Shu Uemura as those lashes are much more suited for photography and high fashion. They're beautiful, high quality lashes no doubt, but definitely not for day-to-day.
    Ardell has some pretty nice lashes and you can find them at drug stores for pretty cheap. If its your first time you should probably try with some fakes to get used to it first =)
    sorry i dont know which ones are the best but i DO know which brand sells the best glue! and its DUO! they have it in both clear and dark-toned. hope this helps!
    try MAC eyelashes there the BEST!!

    Christians: Do you think all other religionists are deluded since they are following false teachings?

    Since Christ is the only way to be saved, do you think the billions of people following other religions who follow other religions are delusional since their gods don’t exist and their teachings are false? Are they all going to hell?Christians: Do you think all other religionists are deluded since they are following false teachings?
    There's another way to be saved, it's called CTRL+S.Christians: Do you think all other religionists are deluded since they are following false teachings?
    As I believe that only a personal relationship with God can truly help one to see what is real, I have to also believe that if someone does not have that personal relationship, they are deluded by what they have been taught by others. This includes Christians who do not have that relationship but practice the traditions instead. As a belief on Christ is the only way to reset the connection to God, therefore is the only way to have that personal relationship with Him, I guess I would have to classify what others believe as false teachings. No offense meant towards them, but I feel a great deal of companssion for them.
    Christ is the way the truth and the life, those who come to heaven do it by him, weather they know it or not. Non-Christians can reach heaven too if they follow their conscience diligently and if they are ignorant of the truth.





    The most sure way to heaven is in the Church Jesus founded, because there are the sacraments of baptism and the sacrament of penance, for the forgiveness of sins.





    God gives sufficient graces to every human person in this world to reach heaven, if they don't, it's not his fault.





    All religions contain some truths.
    Do you think that all people of all religions are deluded because they all think they are right?





    you just want a punching bag





    punch away





    but, it's only rational to realize that with foundationally divergent views of God and eternity the majority of the people on the planet CAN'T be right. They disagree. Some can be right or all can be wrong.. nothing inbetween.








    EDIT - would you say that most of the people who lived in the world 700 years ago were delude just because they thought the world was flat? how insulting you would be... how rude.... how arrogant to assume that the way you see the world is right and the way they saw it was wrong...





    bigot








    I hope you see the point....


    what I just typed is obnoxious, false, and dodges the real issue.... it's an ad hominem attack... and so is what you wrote
    you shouldn't be asking christians to be judging, God is the judge Creator and Planner of all things. If you want to know about God and his plans for the lost, then you should pray and he will answer you. If your not much of a listener you could always look up a passage or two from the Christian Bible or from the Torah and the Koran. They may have some information on both God/ Gods and of Heaven/ Hell, Paradise etc..


    But I can assure you that If you Pray to God and ask him to show you and teach you you will in Gods time begin to see his answers.



    Pretty much...yep





    unless they never heard about Jesus. Because the truth resonates in the hearts of all men, that is why there are christians in every culture....even the cultures that will kill you for being one.
    Unless you are saved by tJesus Christ, you are certainly doomed.
    delusional? no..... misinformed, mislead and following false prophets false teachers and false doctrines...... yes
    No, were deluded (because we belive in something that actually exists and is true), the religious are decieved...
    Yes,Christians think that way and other religionists feel the same way about Christians.
    i dont think they are deluded but i think we need to help them find the right way to christ
    They are just wrong. I wouldn't insult them. Stop sowing discord.
    They are deceived and led by false prophets. The only was to Heaven is through Jesus Christ.
    Funny aint it?
    yes to all
    Heaven is like a giant bathroom full of monogrammed towels with 'his' 'hers' 'its' 'mine' 'ours' 'theirs'
    No, I think it is possible that there is more than one path to God. Glad to help.

    Is it possible to get a false neg with blood test?

    I was wondering cause I had a blood test on 3/17 it was BFN, I had sex on 3/2 so it was 3w 1d and I just still feel like I am prego. I know I am crazy but... can anyone help?Is it possible to get a false neg with blood test?
    Yes it is very possible. Sometimes the hormones just don't show up in tests. Blood or Urine. It's funny when people comment saying that it can't happen and how they think every girl will have the same experience. EVERY girl is different.Is it possible to get a false neg with blood test?
    If you still do not get your period take a hpt or go see your doctor and have the test done again. Best of luck!
    My doctor said that any level of hcg would be detected in my blood, so if your test came back negative then you are not pregnant. The urine tests can be fooled be being taken too early but your blood is different. There has to be a certain amount in your urine before it is detectable, but if you ARE pregnant then it is already detectable in your blood at any time.
    Yes it's possible. I had a blood test come back negative on 3/7/08 then a few weeks later i took a urine test with the doctor


    and i was 5w 2d along!
    If you still haven't had your period and you still think you may be pregnant go in for another test. your hormones may just be low and may not have changed that early on. You can try to do another at home test also.





    good luck and best wishes!!
    If it was too early it can.








    To the people who said if the blood test is wrong then you are not pregnant are totally wrong. My doctor told me this month that it can be taken too early and be wrong!
    that is not true you can not have a false blood test because it in your b;ood and that always right so don't think that
  • hair highlights
  • How can I tell if my dog is pregnant or is having a false pregnancy?

    When I got her I was told she has just had her first heat(she is 7 months old) I have had her now since around the first of January. Her and my male where put together in the yard because she seemed to be more happy with another dog. (I wanted an inside dog)The first week they were together in the yard my husbend noticed her unit was swolen. Two days later the was spotting and then it stoped. I did see him mount her but couldn't see if he had made contact. Now almost 3 weeks later she is more filled out in the back end of her stomach and her nipples are getting harder. She is some what aggressiv with the male now how can I tell is she is pregnant? And is this too soon for her to be showing those signs?How can I tell if my dog is pregnant or is having a false pregnancy?
    Gestation is 63 days. Usually the bltch will go ';off her feed'; in the 3rd to 4th week of pregnancy. You may call your veterinarian to see if he/she is willing to palpate (feel the abdomen) her to see if they can determaine if she is, in fact, pregnant. That would need to be done now since the third week of pregnancy is the best time to palpate. If you want to spend a bit more $$ you can have an ultrasound done. Now.... here is the comment of the day..... you could take her in RIGHT NOW and have her spayed. Yes, if she is pregnant it would also ';take' the pups. But it would avoid unwanted pups that may end up in a shelter.How can I tell if my dog is pregnant or is having a false pregnancy?
    gestation for dogs is about 63 days. if you are able to fit it into your budget the best way is to take her for an ultrasound. if your dogs didn't lock up then she most likely isn't pregnant. if your female was in esterus(a part of her cycle when she is most fertile) when the deed was done then i'd say you are going to be a grandma!!

    Must we abandon the worship of false gods so that they will lose there power? You waste your life?

    The Ori are false gods the more that you worship them the more power you give them. With your prostrations, prayer, and reading the false book of origin you just fuel their dark power. Abandon the Ori they offer you nothing after death!Must we abandon the worship of false gods so that they will lose there power? You waste your life?
    All gods are false - worship is a waste of time, energy and emotions - give it to the people.Must we abandon the worship of false gods so that they will lose there power? You waste your life?
    All gods (Yahweh, Jehovah, Allah, Osiris, Zeus, Loki, etc.) are false.
    Yeah! I mean how can we hope to stand against the Ori now that Jack O'Neil is more concerned with those stranded on the Destiny?
    Don't apply anything you learn about religion in formal education by watching StarGate.
    The only god thas real is the farther of jesus. if you are worshaping any other god you will go to hell
    ';special'; children are as a result of the parents sin. spread the word.

    Is it possible to have a blood test for pregnancy to be a false positive?

    i believe so yes because i had a blood test done and it came out negative and i took a urine test 2 days later and it came out positive, and took another blood test that same day and it came out negative, but i am def pregnant.Is it possible to have a blood test for pregnancy to be a false positive?
    yes it very much is. I know that the dr's and nurses will tell you that you can have a false negative but you can never have a false positive. Well, they are WRONG!!! I took one and it came up positive before I could even finish peeing on the stick. I waited about 2 weeks and took another one. It was negative. I was so upset. I've never had a miscarriage but when you go even 2 weeks thinking and just ';knowing'; you're pregnant only to find that it was a false positive, that mental baby was just ripped out of me. For about a month I couldn't look at a baby or anyone that was visibly pregnant w/out breaking down and crying. Luckily 2 months later, I got an accurate positive reading. That baby is now 6yo!!! =)Is it possible to have a blood test for pregnancy to be a false positive?
    No. The hormone builds up in your blood then spills in your urine. I had a negative pee test at drs office but blood came back positive. I wouldn't trust there pee tests. I had 4 positives then theres came back negative! Trust the blood test.
    Yes it can. My sister had to have a blood test done before she got her tubes tied two years ago and she was pregnant when they did it. The hospital can mix up the results with someone else, or your hormone levels may not be high enough
    there is a slight VERY slight chance of having a false positive. Getting, funky results from a blood test could be a sign of something wrong with your reproductive system or your baby
    highly unlikely, false negatives are way more common.
    It's close to impossible
    1% of the time, yes
    NO
    no

    How do I go about getting false derogatory reports off my credit?

    First of all, get your free credit reports from all three credit reporting agencies. You can do this through the Federal Trade Commission's website, either by submitting via the web or calling the toll free number. After you receive the reports, go through and locate all false reports. Follow the instructions that come with the credit reports on how to take action against the false entries.How do I go about getting false derogatory reports off my credit?
    The exact procedure can be found by looking at the Fair Credit Reporting Act. But here is a brief outline:





    -Get copies of your credit report at


    www.annualcreditreport.com





    -Send a protest letter to the Credit Reporting Agency (CRA) that has the report listed. They will ';verify'; the debt with the creditor, and must respond back within 30 days of the result. Note that ';verify'; only means that the creditor just has to inform the CRA it is a valid debt, and no proof or documentation is required. This is what most likely will happen. At this point you can send the CRA a letter protesting the entry, and they must put your statement on the record.





    -Now send a ';validation demand'; letter to the creditor. That means the creditor must supply copies of all bills, contracts, receipts, and anything that was used to calculate what they say you owe. The must demonstrate you have a legal obligation to pay. They have 30 days to respond.





    If they do send this information, examine it carefully. If it's correct, decide if you still want to go to court. This is the information they will use to defend themselves, so if you have a case you can now take it to court.





    -If you do not get this information within 30 days, send a copy of the validation letter, plus another demand to remove the credit entry to the CRA, informing them that the creditor has violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act. If the CRA still will not remove the entry, you now have grounds to sue the CRA as well.





    Be sure to send all letters by certified mail, keep very accurate logs of when they are mailed and who you talked to. It is NOT necessary to send them by certified mail, return receipt. Your receipt will prove you mailed it, and the tracking number on it can be traced to show it was delivered. That will save you a few dollars in postage.





    Contact me if you need more help. I am not a lawyer or credit counsoler, just someone who has been through this many times before (and still doing it!).





    You are about to go to war! Knowledge of the law is your only weapon! Don't fight these guys unarmed! Read the links below.How do I go about getting false derogatory reports off my credit?
    Contact the credit reporting companies or try this link








    http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/cred鈥?/a>
    You must submitt a disbute form to all three major credit bureaus. Transunion Equifax and Experian.

    If you take a pregnancy test 2 days early can you get a false negative?

    based on an ovulation calendar i should be able to test the 14th (today) but i couldn't wait and tested 2 days ago and it said negative...so could it have just tested to early? is there still a chance that i am pregnant? if i took one today could i already get a different result?If you take a pregnancy test 2 days early can you get a false negative?
    It's pointless testing early. Today would be the earliest you could expect a true result.





    Retest today or tomorrow.If you take a pregnancy test 2 days early can you get a false negative?
    Its a waste of time testing early...You can't gauge when you got pregnant from ovulation. Semen stays alive for 3-5 days...it could be anywhere in that window. Wait till your period is due, and use first morning urine as it has the highest concentration of HCG
    I tried to take a test 3 days before AF was due and it came out BFN. I took another one the day AF was due using FMU and it came out BFP.

    Which of the following statements is false?

    A bacteriophage is a virus that attacks bacteria.


    Some complex viruses have a genome with both RNA and DNA.


    Viruses cannot reproduce by themselves; they must infect a host cell in order to replicate.


    In general, viruses are smaller than bacteria.Which of the following statements is false?
    Through an elimination process that I used to view your question.,the only false answer is #2.Which of the following statements is false?
    1) true


    2) false


    3) true


    4) true. viruses are ALWAYS smaller than bacteria.
    no complex or simple virus has both RNA and DNA in its genome. It can be only either one and usually is RNA.
    The second sentence is false.
  • hair highlights
  • How did social darwinism give a false justification for imperialism?

    Espreses's first two sentences are essentially correct. Social Darwinism was an attempt by people like Herbert Spencer and Francis Galton, but not Darwin himself, to apply Darwinian ideas about natural selection to human society. In other words, the Social Darwinists believed that certain people, and certain societies or civilizations, rose to the top of the human pecking order because they were better evolved.





    Because of this, these people or societies were even justified in imposing their beliefs on other, ';less enlightened,'; people. We see this in the ';white man's burden'; ideas of the British Empire, and even the tendency of the US to try to spread its beliefs about the merits of free-market democracy in places like, say, Iraq. Of course we see the concepts of the Social Darwinists carried to their logical extreme, as espreses points out, in the racial and cultural ideas of the Nazis.





    Unfortunately, espreses follows his first two reasonable, factual sentences with ones that are obviously a reflection of his ideology. Darwin's ideas about the evolution of species through natural selection, while somewhat modified since the 19th Century, form the basis of modern biological thought. Far from being consigned to the ashbin of history, as espreses asserts, Darwinism has only received greater support with the development of sciences that did not even exist in Darwin's day, such as genetics, microbiology, and biochemistry.





    One can always debate the merits of any theory. In fact the essence of science is just this openness to revision as new data or arguments become available. For instance, Newton's theory of gravitation was modified by Einstein, and recent work has led to thinking that Einstein's ideas on the subject may need to be modified, as well. One may accept Darwin's ideas or not, but to suggest, as espreses does, that no educated person accepts Darwin's ideas today is just simply not true. Espreses may not accept these ideas, but the vast majority of biologists, and scientists in general, do.How did social darwinism give a false justification for imperialism?
    The simple answer to this provocative question is this:





    ';Darwinism'; is about survival of the fittest and most adaptable.





    ';Social Darwinism'; is about cultures and societies having relative weaknesses and strengths with the stronger culture having a ';natural right'; to dominate, take over, or stamp out a weaker culture or nation state.





    Imperialism is an overly aggressive form of Social Darwinism.How did social darwinism give a false justification for imperialism?
    It gave scientific legitimacy to the belife that some people were more evolves than others and there fore justified in the conquest of those societies that were technologicaly backward. Darwinisim was also used to justify the barbaric thoeries of Marx and his communist docturine and the rise of Hitler and the Nazi's in Germany and thier theories of racial superiority. Thankfully educated people in the 21st century ahve religated Darwin to the scrap heep of scientific myth and reject that quaint victorian ear nonsense proglomated before cell structure and DNA were better understood. Only in todays government schools and amoung a handfull of racists is Darwin still given any credibility

    Christians: Do you agree that only false religions would omit these words of wisdom?

    ';Let your women keep silence in the places of worship: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law.





    And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the place of worship.';








    %26gt; I see wisdom in these words. Wisdom beyond words. Only a non-divine religion would reject these verses. Do you agree?Christians: Do you agree that only false religions would omit these words of wisdom?
    I think ';it is so clear now'; answered the question correctly, in fact, 100% perfectly acording to my thinking.





    But then, I am the person that struggles with the hadiths. I also think the hadith regarding the beard that Muslim men wear ';was thought, written and spoken'; during a time when Islam was being promoted and the beard was a sign of masculine unity that identified them as Muslim.


    Written, during a time of religious war, when it served a purpose.





    I believe many things literally from the Bible and the Quran, such as ';man shall not kill';; still makes sense doesn't it? But for us to fail to acknowledge that ';some things'; were written 2009, or respectively 1430 years ago under completely different times, and meant for reasons during those times, is LUDICROUS to me.





    I also think that the ';image making'; hadith was meant for those that made IDOLS. (Look up the meaning of the word IDOL) They didn't go buy them at a Pier One shop to decorate their home, but instead made them and worshipped them as God. This was an IDOL. When I buy a painting of an elephant TODAY in 2009, and hang it on the wall...it is not an IDOL. I don't pray to it or worship it as they might have 1430 years ago. It is just art.





    SO, now that I have given some examples of my thinking, (be I right or wrong) allow me to answer your question: I think it acceptable for women to speak in a place of worship TODAY. But in those times, with women, and many men being illiterate, it may have been the wise decision.





    And, I always see your questions idenify you as a forward and deeply critical thinker...what happened to ya here? or are you just bringing some excitement to this place..stirring things up a bit? smile.....Christians: Do you agree that only false religions would omit these words of wisdom?
    To understand 1 Corinthians 14:34-36 one must understand what was happening during that early time of the church. Paul had a group of excited people who want to learn or speak in church. This event caused mass confusion to many and great disorder to the church itself. In order to gain control of this situation Paul asked the women to listen first, ask questions second (when there was time to explain what was going on). Remember, Christianity is new. Thus a formed, controlled environment was being encouraged. Just as a mother may silence a child in church, it does not mean he/she can never speak again or be used by God. It was done out of respect in order to help the child and church mature.
    no, no I don't see wisdom in this !


    unkind faith will support this attitude. not wise one.no shame to ask, probe %26amp; ask for proof. Shame for not speaking %26amp; silence.


    Why woman keep silence, Woman is kept silence %26amp; limited that is why she is not that strong about faith awareness as men have.





    Silence ?


    Disgusting there can be Q %26amp; A why to ask husbands at home, women should be let if not for papacy of course but common religious participation %26amp; awareness then does not seem working in silence !


    Sorry but it is pinching point for me !
    Misogyny and bias are neither admirable nor wise, nor should they ever be the basis for any reasonable moral system.





    Funny how you support a restriction that leaves you in control. I wonder if you'd think these were words of wisdom if you were the one being silenced.
    St Paul couldn't even make up his mind as to whether the people who were with him during his ';conversion experience'; heard anything or didn't hear anything...I would hardly take his words to be the ';voice of God';, nor even to give them any importance outside of his historical context.








    ACTS 9:7 - they heard the voice


    ACTS 22:9 - they didn't hear the voice





    Who says there's no contradictions in the Bible?
    My gf is better at leading than me... she is better at doing like work than me lol and guess what! my pastor is a woman and she a helluva lot better than the guy pastor. but again i would not trust a woman with her finger on the red button cause one slip up by a country and BOOOOOOOOOOOOM there goes my day lol
    There is no God except the God of Man's creation.





    Having created God, Man superimposes his prejudices on God and calls it God's will.





    Those who cannot see this are wilfully blind.





    http://www.1party4all.co.uk
    Since my Lord and Savior said it, I believe it and accept it.





    Unfortunately, I know of no Christian churches that follow this command from God.
    It is a fact that god did not create women to be leaders. I'm sorry if this upsets you liberals out there, but this is fact. God created each of us with a purpose.
    No, I would not. You can be mistaken, or uniformed without being ';false'; or fake. That applies to anyone and any group on any subject. Even ';experts'; have a margin of error.
    I see misogyny in those words. Misogyny beyond words.
    we are told in revelation not to add or take out anything from God's Word.
    St Paul was a misogynist.
    I would say get over it. You already asked this once today.
    C'mon, you know I was just kidding...
    Sexist pig.
    Some saint that paul guy must have been
    haha. Hmm. What was that saying again? Oh yeah: ';You're taking the Bible out of context.';
    they should not be omitted, but at least understood
    this is joke right, LOL lol

    Is it possible to have a false positive reading from a home preg. test?

    i heard it was possible but very rare. is this true?Is it possible to have a false positive reading from a home preg. test?
    Without a doubt%26gt;%26gt;YES!!!! Home preg tests are a complete nightmare. There are so many factors that can cause false positives. So, if you are looking for a good way to drive yourself nuts..use a home preg test as your only source of determination.


    I have had more than one nightmare with these things, and ya think I would know better. I currently have an 8 year old that was undetected by three home preg tests. I had to go and get a serum HCG test to determine she was there. Last year I had a home preg test come back positive. Long story short, I had an ovarian cysts explode..it picked up the HcG. Currently, I am waitting results on another HcG test because a home preg test said I was preg. Mind you this is a human inpossiblity. The best advice I can give you. Go see your gynocologist and get a serum test completed.Is it possible to have a false positive reading from a home preg. test?
    Yep it is really, i tested 2 on home pregnancy kits and they were both right, maybe you should try again or just go doctors.
    yes
    Its very possible only way to know 100% is from your doctor
    Yes, quite possible.


    Try another one just to make sure.


    That coupled with missing your period for over two weeks is a good indication you are pregnant.


    God Bless.
    Yes, my mom gave me one when I was nine (she's insane!)


    and it came up positive. I had never even kissed a boy.
    yes, sometimes it is possible depending on what brand you buy. I would prefer ept. it is most likely 99% correct.
    it is possible but usually rare, go to your doctor and explain u had a positive test and want another one done to make sure, if u are pregnant u will need to see ur doctor anyway...
    It happens all the time...it's not as rare as you think, really.
    yes, if your worried about go to the health center nearest to you!
    Yes it is because my sister-in-law had a false pregnancy test and she knew because her doctor told her!
    yes it is possible.


    with my 1st pregnany I had a positive result on pregnancy test. Went to dr they did blood tests which came up negative for pregnancy. I was confused. I had ultrasound few weeks later and found out I was 7wks.
    yes
    Before I got my hcg levels back I took a home test the same day as well. I called the hospital to see what my results was because by the time the doctor would receive them it would be the next day, yet my home came out positive and the hospital could NOT tell me over a phone what the results was of there's yet she told me that when home one come back positive they are right!They may com back as neg. and yet be wrong yet she said BELIEVE the home ones! GOOD LUCK!